Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version

Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version

Author Martinez, Bruna Reclusa Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Staboli, Isabela Maschk Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Budiman-Mak, Elly Google Scholar
Yi, Liu Chiao Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) in its Brazilian Portuguese version. Methods: The validity and reliability of the FFI were tested in 50 volunteers, with plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia and chronic ankle sprain. The FFI validity process used the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) questionnaires. The correlation between FFI, SF-36 and FAOS was done using the Pearson's linear coefficient. The inter and intra-evaluator reliability was ascertained by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the internal consistency by means of Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The scores were used to assess the standard error measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and ceiling floor and effects. Results: The validity process showed that there were correlations between FFI and the "pain" and "social aspects" subscales of SF-36 and all subscales of FAOS, except for "other symptoms". The Brazilian-Portuguese version of FFI showed excellent intra and interevaluator correlations, with an ICC range of 0.99-0.97 and score reliability that was considered highly satisfactory, with Cronbach's alpha range of 0.80-0.61. The SEMs for inter and intra-evaluator reliability were 1.32 and 1.08, respectively. The MDC was 2.42 (90 % confidence interval). No ceiling and floor effect were detected. Conclusions: The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the FFI questionnaire was found to be a valid and reliable instrument for foot function evaluation, and can be used both in scientific settings and in clinical practice.
Keywords Foot diseases
Outcome assessment
Validation studies
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-coverage Cham
Language English
Date 2016
Published in Springerplus. Cham, v. 5, p. -, 2016.
ISSN 2193-1801 (Sherpa/Romeo, impact factor)
Publisher Springer International Publishing Ag
Extent -
Access rights Open access Open Access
Type Article
Web of Science ID WOS:000391808300015

Show full item record


File Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)




My Account