Oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea in children

Oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea in children

Author Carvalho, Fernando R. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Lentini-Oliveira, Debora A. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Prado, Lucila B. F. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Prado, Gilmar F. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Carvalho, Luciane B. C. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Abstract Background Apnoea is a breathing disorder marked by the absence of airflow at the nose or mouth. In children, risk factors include adenotonsillar hypertrophy, obesity, neuromuscular disorders and craniofacial anomalies. The most common treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) in childhood is adeno-tonsillectomy. This approach is limited by its surgical risks, mostly in children with comorbidities and, in some patients, by recurrence that can be associated with craniofacial problems. Oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances have been used for patients who have OSAS and craniofacial anomalies because they hold the lower jaw (mandible) forwards which potentially enlarges the upper airway and increases the upper airspace, improving the respiratory function. Objectives To assess the effects of oral appliances or functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea in children. Search methods We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 7 April 2016)

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL

2016, Issue 3) in the Cochrane Library (searched 7 April 2016)

MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 7 April 2016)

Embase Ovid (1980 to 7 April 2016)

LILACS BIREME (from 1982 to 7 April 2016)

BBO BIREME (from 1986 to 7 April 2016) and SciELO Web of Science (from 1997 to 7 April 2016). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials on 7 April 2016. We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. Selection criteria All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing all types of oral and functional orthopaedic appliances with placebo or no treatment, in children 15 years old or younger. Primary outcome: reduction of apnoea to less than one episode per hour. Secondary outcomes: dental and skeletal relationship, sleep parameters improvement, cognitive and phonoaudiological function, behavioural problems, quality of life, side effects (tolerability) and economic evaluation. Data collection and analysis Two review authors screened studies and extracted data independently. Authors were contacted for additional information. We calculated risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for all important dichotomous outcomes. We assessed the quality of the evidence of included studies using GRADEpro software. Main results The initial search identified 686 trials. Only one trial, reporting the results from a total of 23 children and comparing an oral appliance to no treatment, was suitable for inclusion in the review. The trial assessed apnoea-hypopnoea, daytime symptoms (sleepiness, irritability, tiredness, school problems, morning headache, thirstiness in the morning, oral breathing and nasal stuffiness) and night-time symptoms (habitual snoring, restless sleep and nightmares measured by questionnaire). Results were inconsistent across outcomes measures and time points. The evidence was considered very low quality. Authors' conclusions There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in children. Oral appliances or functional orthopaedic appliances may be considered in specified cases as an auxiliary in the treatment of children who have craniofacial anomalies which are risk factors for apnoea.
Keywords Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive [therapy]
Adolescent
Child
HumansConsort Statement
Adenotonsillectomy
Adolescents
Management
Diagnosis
Quality
Infants
Trials
Values
Language English
Sponsor Brazilian Cochrane Center, Brazil
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK
NIHR
Cochrane Oral Health Global Alliance
Grant number External sources
Brazilian Cochrane Center, Brazil.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.
This project was supported by the NIHR, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to Cochrane Oral Health. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the review authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, the NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health.
Cochrane Oral Health Global Alliance, Other.
The production of Cochrane Oral Health reviews has been supported financially by our Global Alliance since 2011 (ohg.cochrane.org/partnerships-alliances). Contributors over the last year have been: British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry, UK
British Society of Paediatric Dentistry, UK
Centre for Dental Education and Research at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India
National Center for Dental Hygiene Research & Practice, USA
New York University College of Dentistry, USA
NHS Education for Scotland, UK.
Date 2016
Published in Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews. Hoboken, n. 10, p. CD005520, 2016.
ISSN 1469-493X (Sherpa/Romeo, impact factor)
Publisher Hospital Clinicas, Univ Sao Paulo
Extent CD005520
Origin http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005520.pub3
Access rights Open access Open Access
Type Revisão
Web of Science ID WOS:000389599800021
URI http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49315

Show full item record




File

Name: WOS000389599800021.pdf
Size: 339.4Kb
Format: PDF
Description:
Open file

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account