Can selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy be better than unilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy?

Can selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy be better than unilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy?

Author Arruda, Homero O. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Paula, Adriano A.p. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Suarez, Ruben Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Cury, José Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Srougi, Miguel Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Institution Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Abstract OBJECTIVE: To propose a new modality of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy as a complementary treatment for patients with high risk, stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 76 patients with stage I nonseminomatous testis tumor (T1-T4, NX, M0) treated by orchiectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Among them, 33 patients underwent unilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (URL) and 43 selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (SRL). URL consisted in removing the lymph nodes located around the great vessel homolateral to the tumor (aorta or vena cava and iliac vessels), and anterior and posterior to the contralateral great vessel (aorta or vena cava). SRL was performed removing the lymph nodes located anterior and between the great vessels (aorta or vena cava) and laterally to the homolateral great vessel, extending the distal dissection until the level of inferior mesenteric artery. In these groups of patients, the incidence of disease recurrence, disease-free survival index, and frequency of post-operative aspermia were assessed. Mean post-operative follow-up time was 96 months. RESULTS: In the SRL group there was only 5% of aspermia versus 79% in the URL group (p < 0.0001). Tumor recurrence was observed in only 5 of the 76 patients and was not related to the surgical technique. The disease-free survival rate after the mean follow-up of 96 months was similar in both groups, being 94% in the SRL group and 93% in the URL group. CONCLUSION: The selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy constitutes an effective technique with a lower morbidity than unilateral lymphadenectomy, representing an excellent option for the management of patients with high-risk, stage I nonseminomatous testis tumor.
Keywords testis
germ cell tumor
neoplasm metastasis
lymph node excision
Language English
Date 2003-10-01
Published in International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 29, n. 5, p. 412-417, 2003.
ISSN 1677-5538 (Sherpa/Romeo)
Publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
Extent 412-417
Origin http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382003000500004
Access rights Open access Open Access
Type Article
SciELO ID S1677-55382003000500004 (statistics in SciELO)
URI http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1846

Show full item record




File

Name: S1677-55382003000500004.pdf
Size: 171.4Kb
Format: PDF
Description:
Open file

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account